All articles
Inside How Retail AI Turns Live Inventory Data Into A Store-Level Sales Advantage
Uttam Kumar, Engineering Manager at American Eagle Outfitters, says real-time inventory visibility is the operational fix brick and mortar has been waiting for.

Make The CMO Wire one of your go-to sources on Google
AI is usually something people think about as replacing human beings. But we aren't replacing human beings. We're making them more capable of doing things that were taking longer to do.
Retail AI may have started with simple chatbots, but it's quickly becoming a sophisticated intelligence layer that significantly increases the chance of a sale. The secret here lies in leveraging inventory data: AI-powered systems can now track retail stores' live inventory, identify what's selling, and automatically reorder stock before shelves run short. Rather than serving as a shiny add-on, AI in this use case is the foundation for helping brick-and-mortar move product, reduce fulfillment costs and build the kind of reliability that keeps customers coming back for more.
Uttam Kumar has spent 18 years turning retail technology into store-level reality. As an Engineering Manager at American Eagle Outfitters, he works where AI either becomes useful or stays stuck in pitch-deck territory: inventory systems, store operations, fulfillment, and the associate tools that shape the customer experience. For Kumar, the true value of AI lies in its ability to break down organizational silos and supercharge human capability with data.
"AI is usually something people think about as replacing human beings. But we aren't replacing human beings. We're making them more capable of doing things that were taking longer to do," Kumar says.
Saving the sale and protecting the margin
Typically, store associates operating on legacy point-of-sale systems are blind to the exact contents of their own back rooms, let alone the real-time inventory of nearby locations. But AI is quickly changing that.
"Using AI, we are putting that power in the associate's hands so they can see live inventory. Our target is to avoid losing an in-store customer by empowering the store associate to convert them from a prospective buyer into an actual buyer," Kumar says, noting how this operational fix directly aids in-store discovery and conversion. But the implications are helping with more than just saving one sale. Only a few years ago, it could take a minimum of 24 hours for an in-store sale to be exported to a sales audit and reflected in a brand’s enterprise inventory management system. Today, AI eliminates that latency, processing sales continuously and allowing retailers to dynamically route products.
This real-time visibility is fundamentally reshaping the retail business model. By instantly identifying which stores are moving product quickly and which are stagnating, AI allows brands to shift stock on the fly or optimize omnichannel fulfillment by routing online orders to the most cost-effective shipping locations. "Eventually, the stores that don't sell an item have to ship it back to the distribution center or put it in clearance. For us, that's a margin loss," Kumar explains. "With AI, we are able to make decisions about where we should move that inventory to maximize our margins."
The 48-hour engineering cycle
For retail engineering teams, the AI revolution is assisting most meaningfully with speedy implementation. The traditional "waterfall" method of building retail software that takes months to scope, build, and deploy is quickly being replaced by rapid prototyping assisted by AI. During the recent ShopTalk 2026 event, this acceleration was a point of pride among technical teams. Brands like Tecovas and The Vitamin Shoppe openly discussed their rapid engineering cycles, competing over who could spin up and deploy new in-store tools the fastest.
Kumar is the first to admit his shock at the speed at which this is evolving. "I could never have imagined in my 18 years in retail that I could have an idea, build it in two or three days, put it in a store, and see how it is performing before deciding whether to scale it," he says. "As an engineer, AI is enabling me to build those tools and test those ideas as soon as possible."
The SaaS trap and the myth of 'good data'
Though undeniably powerful, scaling at this speed does come with significant risk. This is particularly true in the case of a flood of third-party vendors pitching out-of-the-box AI solutions to retail buyers. When Kumar assesses these platforms, he's increasingly pushing back against SaaS models that require brands to export their proprietary data.
"The first thing I evaluate is how the vendor hosts the AI solution. If they require us to use a SaaS-based application in their environment, they are asking us to hand over sensitive customer and payment information. As a company, I see that as a significant risk," he says, echoing concerns shared by industry analysts evaluating AI agents. To mitigate this, his organization relies on a cross-functional AI Council that includes security and operations teams to vet every tool.
Kumar is equally critical of the buzzwords vendors use to sell their products. Many AI platforms claim they simply need a brand to provide "good data" to function properly, but he sees that logic as fundamentally flawed. "When vendors claim their AI needs 'good data,' they often get stuck trying to actually define what that means. Quality is entirely based on perspective, so you cannot objectively label data as good or bad. We are not looking for 'good' data; we simply need centralized data."
Breaking silos for hyper-personalization
Centralized data is the key piece teams need to break silos between engineering, customer service, fulfillment, and marketing teams. By reducing fragmented software and tool sprawl, engineering teams can build the unified backend it requires to unlock ambitious goals in marketing like the ones Kumar is building.
Across the industry, centralized customer information is the prerequisite for hyper-personalization and customized pricing strategies. But if AI personalization goes too far, it risks alienating the very shoppers it is trying to court. Recent examples of retailers tying purchase history to dynamic pricing introduce a delicate ethical and brand challenge. "At the individual customer level, people might not like it. Because if I'm getting a shirt for $10 and you are getting it for $12, you will not be happy," Kumar notes, highlighting the fragile nature of modern consumer behavior and brand trust. "Those are the discussions we are having about how to strategize so the customer feels more connected to our brand."
Ultimately, the convergence of operations, engineering, and marketing allows retailers to stop reacting to the market and start anticipating it. "Usually we do a promotion, and once that is wrapped up, we look at how it performed," Kumar concludes. "Now, we are using all this historical data and looking at it from different angles to determine the right way to decide our future strategy."
The views and opinions expressed are those of Uttam Kumar and do not represent the official policy or position of any organization.




